Transcript of Erich fromm:imati ili biti(). Results Erich fromm:imati ili biti( 58) Drive MODUS IMANJA MODUS BIVSTVOVANJA Core UČENJE SIJEČANJE. “How to Be a Good Creature: A Memoir in Thirteen Animals” by Sy Montgomery “ This is a beautiful book — essential reading for anyone who loves animals and. HomeEric From – Imati ili Biti. Eric From – Imati ili Biti. August 3, mzsula · Erich Fromm-imati ili biti. Advertisements. Share this: Twitter · Facebook · Google .
|Published (Last):||21 April 2013|
|PDF File Size:||12.42 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Erich fromm:imati ili biti() by Megy Matijevic on Prezi
This article reads like a review rather than an encyclopedic description of the subject. In the industrial age, the development of this economic system was no longer determined rfomm the question of what is good for man, but rather of what is good for the growth of the system.
So, the economic system of society served people in such a way in which only their personal interests were intended to impart.
This page was last edited on 6 Novemberat This is the truth which people deny and thus people of the modern world have completely lost their inner selves. Views Read Edit View erch. Wikipedia articles with style issues from March All articles with style issues Pages to import images to Wikidata.
These hopes reached their highs when the industrial age began. He mentions the great promise of unlimited happiness, freedommaterial abundance, and domination of nature. The people having unlimited needs and desires like the Roman emperorsthe English and French noblemen were the people who got the most out of it. Fromm writes that modern society has become materialistic and prefers “having” to “being”. To Have or to Be?
One could feel that there would be unlimited production and hence unlimited consumption. The great promise failed due to the unachievable aims of life, i. i,ati
Eric From – Imati ili Biti | ISTINA I NAŠE VREME
In every mode of life, people should ponder more on “being” nature and not towards the “having” nature. The point of being is more important as everyone is mortal, and thus having of possessions will become useless after their deathbecause the possessions which are transferred to the life after frimmwill be what the person actually was inside.
Modern industrialization has made great promises, but all these promises are developed to fulfill their interests and increase their possessions. The materialistic nature of people of “having” has been more developed than “being”.
Please help improve this article to make it neutral in tone and meet Wikipedia’s quality standards. Retrieved from ” https: