David Boonin-Vail. In her article, “A Defense of Abortion,” Judith Jarvis Thomson defended the following thesis: the impermissibility of abortion does. David Boonin has written the most thorough and detailed case for the moral permissibility of abortion yet published. Critically examining a wide range of. Boonin, David, A Defense of Abortion, Cambridge University Press, , pp, $ (pbk), ISBN Reviewed by: Win-chiat Lee.
|Published (Last):||15 December 2009|
|PDF File Size:||9.21 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.96 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The discussion of developmental biology in Chapter 3 is really painfully outdated; while that’s to be expected for a bkonin that is almost 15 years old, the material was actually about 10 years out of date when Boonin published the book. Equally, there are plausible arguments in favor of the view that fetuses with Down syndrome also have a right to life, which means that permitting their abortion might be gravely wrong.
To illustrate this point, one might assume that she actually enjoyed being connected to the bionin, but once she realized that the violinist would booinn a burden to her in the future, she aboortion to disconnect herself in order to eliminate the existence of the violinist.
The Ethics of Abortion: Stretton – – Journal of Medical Ethics 34 However, if so, the implications must also be recognized, that is, fetuses can permissibly be anaesthetized in order to prevent consciousness and then killed after they have been born and a conjoined twin—dependent on his or her twin to survive—can permissibly be killed.
A very dense book. Just as your ownership of your body would be entitle you to unplug yourself from the violinist, thereby causing him to die, so, Thomson argues, women are entitled to abort their pregnancies even though fetuses are persons.
The emergence of consciousness: The Good Samaritan Argument. Erin rated it really liked it Nov 27, Then, in order to rule out abortioh, one might instead invoke other differences between unconscious fetuses and infants that derense a differentiation between abortion and infanticide. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. This usually means that the brain must be sufficiently developed in order to produce rudimentary manifestation of a rational soul with intellect and will.
Critically examining a wide array of arguments that have attempted to establish that every human fetus has a right to life, Boonin posits that defensf of these arguments fail on their own terms. Cases, Principles, and Reasoning. The second kind focuses on the difference between the nature of the act of disconnecting from the violinist and the nature of the act of aborting abprtion fetus letting die vs.
Like the person who does not violate the violinist’s right to life by disconnecting herself from the violinist, a mother who aborts a fetus also does not violate the fetus’s right to life.
Therefore, if the fetus has the right to life at conception, then it must be due to the fact that it will come to possess later on the relevant properties you and I already possess. However, such worries are still about the consequences of the diagnosis and the possible physiological sequelae for the parents and the aboetion of the family after birth. Alex marked it as to-read Aug 05, It would be more reasonable to suggest that it is the burden of being forced to give birth before adoption that differentiates abortion and infanticide.
Perspectives from cognitive psychology. I suspect this is true, and it was absolutely true at the time that the book was published.
A Defense of Abortion // Reviews // Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews // University of Notre Dame
Explore the Home Gift Guide. From Human Rights to Sentient Rights. Abortin major book will be especially helpful to those teaching applied ethics and bioethics in philosophy departments or professional schools of law and medicine.
I will start by discussing the criterion of birth, followed by the Good Samaritan argument. Abstract Although the abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome has become commonplace, infanticide is still widely rejected.
Mar 19, Icten keskin rated it it was amazing. I recommend booonin to anyone who takes a stance on the issue and definitely anyone interested in philosophy, informal logic, and debate.
The outcome is a very exhaustive treatment of the subject of the moral permissibility of abortion, which also makes it a very exhausting and demanding read. Morgan marked it as to-read Jul 14, I argue against such a defense of the abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome below. The following sentence offers no help: Peach – – International Philosophical Quarterly 45 3: In an admittedly sefense obvious way, an account based on a criterion of delayed hominization that aims to justify abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome also seems vulnerable to this objection.
Nicole marked it as to-read Aug 21, Moral relevance is also dvid essential idea.
She changes her mind and booniin disconnects herself. By anaesthetizing the fetus, such an action would be permissible under criteria based on the existence of consciousness.
Admittedly, the cost of not permitting women to abort fetuses diagnosed with Down syndrome would generally be higher—even if it cannot be ruled out, as I demonstrated above, that it would be less costly than infanticide in some circumstances. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
Nevertheless, screening fetuses for Down syndrome has become a common obstetric practice in many countries [ 5 ], and as no treatment is available for the defects detected, the screening is intended to provide information that can serve as a basis for deciding whether or not to abort the fetus [ 6 ].